NHL Player Safety suspended McDavid for three games for his cross check on Canucks forward Connor Garland.
McDavid was subtle and tried to hold back his criticism of the NHL's decision, but more so stressed the need to move on from the incident and the noise surrounding it.
McDavid obviously isn't thrilled with the decision, but does take responsibility for his actions and admits it deserved a suspension. Given past cross checks, 2 games would have made sense - 3 games, like McDavid said, is a little harsh.
The Oilers captain spoke at large too that most of the NHL believes penalties should be called as penalties fairly at all times, regardless of context of the game or penalty count already.
Still, TSN insider Ryan Rishaug reported yesterday that the Oilers and McDavid will not be filing an appeal to NHL Player Safety to reduce the suspension.
Instead, the Oilers organization released a statement yesterday that subtly hinted at their frustrating with McDavid's suspension.
The entire incident has significantly raised the debate about the NHL protecting its star players, and putting them in positions to succeed - or even just play the game. If a penalty was called on Garland, the NHL wouldn't be without their best player for 3 games.
According to Bob Stauffer, Connor McDavid currently ranks 197th in penalties drawn per 60 minutes of play this season.
He's also on pace to draw half as many penalties as last year. That has to be inconsistent refereeing considering McDavid is the best player in the NHL.
The Oilers and Canucks will face off for a rematch game tomorrow night in Edmonton, in what should be a great game, with possibilities for tension right from puck drop.
POLL | ||
JANVIER 22 | 706 ANSWERS Connor McDavid speaks out against suspension in first interview since Oilers and Canucks incident Do you think McDavid's suspension was too harsh? | ||
Yes | 585 | 82.9 % |
No | 121 | 17.1 % |
List of polls |